nanog mailing list archives
Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
From: "ken harris." <ken () boii com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 19:52:25 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
dents - who is this again?
mindspring. but one of mindspring's authoritative, burdell.cc.gatech.edu runs 4.9.8-rel, so they still depend a bit on bind.
--bill
-ken harris.
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christian Kuhtz (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Carter, Gregory (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Karyn Ulriksen (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Simon Waters (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- BIND, djbdns, commercialization jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- genetic diversity w/ DNS bmanning (Feb 24)
- Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS ken harris. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)