nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 19:29:47 -0500
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:03:25PM -0800, Paul A Vixie wrote:
The category "OS vendors" gets a little fishy... Do Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox get on the list if they sign the NDA? How about Patrick Volkerding?If they're mature trustworthy people (I know Linus but not those other guys) and if they need some time to get patches ready for large user bases, then I feel sure that they'd be welcomed gladly.
How about large SP's like ourselves who have many machines to keep current and are exposed to the world? How about a, say, russian SP not bound to U.S. laws? Will they be allowed to subscribe to your list or not? How will you enforce such a closed user group on an international scale? I really don't want to take a position either way, but I think the above are interesting and important questions. I would appreciate if you could shed some light on those particular areas of concern.
Why are we discussing this on NANOG?
'cause it does affect operators to some extent (some of us do use BIND for production purposes in one way or another). Besides, we got nothing better to do apparently... *sigh* Cheers, Chris -- Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S. "I speak for myself only.""
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Vivien M. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christian Kuhtz (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- BIND, djbdns, commercialization jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- genetic diversity w/ DNS bmanning (Feb 24)
- Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS ken harris. (Feb 24)