nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: jamie rishaw <jamie () arpa com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:36:35 -0500
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:43:47PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
My god, are there really this many idiots out there that don't grasp how the world works?
core1.chi(config)# router opinion JoeRhett % NANOG-5-NOSUCH: NanogTalk node 31337.123 misconfigured: unnecessary comment/opinion discarded
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- BIND, djbdns, commercialization jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- genetic diversity w/ DNS bmanning (Feb 24)
- Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS ken harris. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christopher Ambler (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeff Workman (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)