nanog mailing list archives
Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
From: Scott Solmonson <scosol () speedera com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 10:05:02 -0700
tony bourke wrote:
True, thats why I don't particularly like LocalDirectors. Most of the other load balancing solutions do offer GigE, however. I prefer LB over clustering as it gives you more flexibility in what you use as far as your platform. Microsoft's clustering software limits you to microsoft, while I'm not sure if resonate will let you do both UNIX and Windows.
Thought I'd chime in- (Used to be head of Tech Support at Resonate) Yes, Central Dispatch works on Windows, Solaris, and Linux (maybe others)- And they can all co-exist within the same cluster. -- Scott Solmonson Speedera Networks Inc. -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* scosol () speedera com / 408.970.1591
Current thread:
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron York, Tracy (CEI-Atlanta) (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Richard Colella (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Sutantyo, Danny (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 07)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Scott Solmonson (Jul 07)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Bennett Todd (Jul 06)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Alberto Begliomini (Jul 06)
- Re: [load balancing] RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron kevin graham (Jul 06)