nanog mailing list archives

Re: Packet Loss


From: "M. David Leonard" <mdl () equinox shaysnet com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:28:21 -0500 (EST)


        Young people these days have it too easy,  Why, when I was a lad, 
we had to stay up all night slaving over cuneiform tablets, then load 
them into reed baskets on the backs of donkeys bright and early the 
following morning for the trek to the abacus room.  And none of that 
binary or decimal stuff, either - it was straight sexagesimal.  But try 
to tell the young folks of today was it used to be like and they ignore you.


                                        David Leonard
                                        ShaysNet
                                        (whose children and grandchildren 
think he dates from the early Pleistocene)

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:53:06 EST, you said:
In addition to the mylar punch tape the machine was usually an octal
machine.

The machine was binary. You grouped in bunches of 3 just to make it easier.

As opposed to the IBM 1620 and similar *real* decimal machines. ;)
-- 
                              Valdis Kletnieks
                              Operating Systems Analyst
                              Virginia Tech


Current thread: