nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet Loss
From: "M. David Leonard" <mdl () equinox shaysnet com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:28:21 -0500 (EST)
Young people these days have it too easy, Why, when I was a lad, we had to stay up all night slaving over cuneiform tablets, then load them into reed baskets on the backs of donkeys bright and early the following morning for the trek to the abacus room. And none of that binary or decimal stuff, either - it was straight sexagesimal. But try to tell the young folks of today was it used to be like and they ignore you. David Leonard ShaysNet (whose children and grandchildren think he dates from the early Pleistocene) On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:53:06 EST, you said:In addition to the mylar punch tape the machine was usually an octal machine.The machine was binary. You grouped in bunches of 3 just to make it easier. As opposed to the IBM 1620 and similar *real* decimal machines. ;) -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Paul Timmins (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss doug (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- RE: Packet Loss Muir, Ronald (Dec 15)
- RE: Packet Loss Muir, Ronald (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss M. David Leonard (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen Stuart (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jason (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jon Mansey (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Mr. James W. Laferriere (Dec 15)