nanog mailing list archives
Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss))
From: Jonathan Disher <jdisher () eng bamboo com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:42:43 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Daniel Golding wrote:
advertise blocks smaller than a /20 to each other (/24 is a more normal filtering level these days). Also ensure that whichever of the upstreams
Is it safe to assume[*] that an announced /23 will not be filtered by any major (or even the minor) backbones? We just got our ARIN allocation (and I won't go into that, the lag time was all my fault), and I'm currently planning allocation for some remote offices and a couple of hosted buildouts. I'm hoping to not have to announce anything larger than a /23 from any one site unless necessary. -j [*] - It's never safe to assume anything internet related; relatively speaking, is it safe... -Jonathan Disher -Systems and Network Engineer, Web Operations -Internet Pictures Corporation, Palo Alto, CA -[v] (650) 388-0497 | [p] (877) 446-9311 | [e] jdisher () eng ipix com
Current thread:
- multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Jade E. Deane (Dec 15)
- RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)
- Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Jonathan Disher (Dec 15)
- RE: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) nanog (Dec 16)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Travis Pugh (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel L. Golding (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Travis Pugh (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel L. Golding (Dec 17)
- Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Jonathan Disher (Dec 15)
- RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)