nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet Loss
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:10:14 -0500
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:53:06 EST, you said:
In addition to the mylar punch tape the machine was usually an octal machine.
The machine was binary. You grouped in bunches of 3 just to make it easier.
As opposed to the IBM 1620 and similar *real* decimal machines. ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Paul Timmins (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss doug (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Muir, Ronald (Dec 15)
- RE: Packet Loss Muir, Ronald (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss M. David Leonard (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen Stuart (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jason (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jon Mansey (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Mr. James W. Laferriere (Dec 15)