nanog mailing list archives
RE: Packet Loss
From: Mathew Butler <mbutler () tonbu com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:28:54 -0800
Well, not IBM itself, but some splinter faction... :) -Mat -----Original Message----- From: Paul Timmins [mailto:paul () timmins net] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 11:24 PM To: tme () 21rst-century com Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Packet Loss PS: I think it would be vaguely funny for April 1st if IBM ran a few ads for really really old IBM stuff, like a really really old typewriter, or a paper tape punch as an eBusiness storage solution or something like that. Taking old stuff and acting like it is top of the line, and using modern advertising and marketing technologies to do it. "With the remarkable power of the PC/XT, I can get my work done much quicker", etc ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss M. David Leonard (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen Stuart (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jason (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Jon Mansey (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Scott Solmonson (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Mr. James W. Laferriere (Dec 15)