nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAE-Central
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 11:37:34 -0800
... The current FDDI NAPs are just not able to support the current load and their is no good way to expand them. ...
i don't agree. paix's gigaswitches are isolated by cheap private peering. an ixp is still a fine place to exchange packets, as long as the operator of the ixp will run intercage crossconnects for insigificantly low fees.
Current thread:
- MAE-Central Kent W. England (Feb 02)
- Re: MAE-Central Phil Howard (Feb 02)
- Re: MAE-Central Kent W. England (Feb 02)
- Re: MAE-Central Jeremy Porter (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Nathan Stratton (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Dave Siegel (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Sean M. Doran (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Paul A Vixie (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Doug Wilson (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Kent W. England (Feb 02)
- Re: MAE-Central Phil Howard (Feb 02)
- Re: MAE-Central Ryan Brooks (Feb 03)
- Re: MAE-Central Sean M. Doran (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Mark Tripod (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Nathan Stratton (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Mark Tripod (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Ryan Brooks (Feb 04)
- Re: MAE-Central Dorian R. Kim (Feb 04)