nanog mailing list archives

Re: MAE-Central


From: Jeremy Porter <jerry () fc net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 10:01:22 -0600


In message <199802030422.XAA06212 () merit edu>, "Kent W. England" writes:
At 09:28 AM 2/2/98 , Phil Howard wrote:

http://www.nwfusion.com/news/0128mae.html

How about your password to access this?  Or were you quoting the entire
article?  Where will this MAE-Central be located?


Sorry, but I can't find a Worldcom press release anywhere. I don't feel
right cutting and pasting the entire article, but the location is slated to
be Dallas.

(BTW, isn't it scandalous that MFS would copy the PacBell NAP and build a
MAE using S'com BPX switches? I went back and checked the nanog archives
and compiled a list of all the ISPs that swore they would never connect to
an ATM NAP. How many are planning to disconnect from the MAEs when the ATM
switches come up?)

--Kent

Its particuarlly bad that MFS starts this when they already have a
MAE-Dallas based on their standard cisco platforms.  The local
ISPs put together an alternative interconnect to reduce costs
and MFS comes out with this shit.  I know one company that
isn't going to be doing any new business with MFS/Worldcom.


---
Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc.      jerry () fc net
PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708  |  1-800-968-8750  |  512-458-9810
http://www.fc.net


Current thread: