nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 15:59:02 -0500
The next step will be "you must pay a hefty price for every packet transitting our pipes", directing transitting (packets only going through specified routes) and strong-arm tactics on the smaller players to sign up with one specific network. Then you'll see regulation akin to what telcos have, with the concommitant expense.
Who remembers TELENET? Formerly owned by GTE, then SPRINT. Where do you think senior corporate management comes from? -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Scott Huddle (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Matt Sommer (Aug 14)
- FW: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Hank Nussbacher (Aug 15)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Tracy J. Snell (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Vadim Antonov (Aug 18)