nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: "Tracy J. Snell" <tjs () EnterAct com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 16:39:20 -0500 (CDT)
On Sun, 16 Aug 1998, Michael Shields wrote:
At any rate, I agree that the ultimate decision will be made by the stockholders and BBN customers. It is unfortunate that in the mean time a few unknowing BBN customers will lose connectivity to some of the largest web sites on the Internet.Yes. If I were a BBN customer I'd be very upset -- because BBN would have reduced the value of my connection to them. Not because they are violating Internet ideals.
As luck would have it, BBN is waiting on me to renew our T3 Monday. I'd say that should give me a good opportunity to let them know how I feel! Now if GoodNet would finally deliver their circuit to us I'd feel much less worried. -- Tracy Snell (312) 588-2900 President, EnterAct, L.L.C. http://www.enteract.com tjs () enteract com
Current thread:
- FW: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- FW: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Hank Nussbacher (Aug 15)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Tracy J. Snell (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Vadim Antonov (Aug 18)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)