nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBN Peering issues


From: "Matt Sommer" <cache22 () webkorner com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 14:35:22 -0400

you keep missing the most obvious interpretation:

1.85% of exodus's output goes to bbn.
10-30% of bbn's input is from exodus.

this may still be a ridiculous figure, but maybe not, if exodus is hosting
30 of the top 100 web sites.


off.  Let's face the facts, BBN is only 1.85% of my traffic.  By all
accounts,
we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic.  Lots of
luck.  We
actually see a massively inverted benefit scale in this particular
situation.

It seems intuitively reasonable to me that 1.85% of Exodus input comes from
BBN.
No arguments there. I would like to know where the "By all accounts, we
estimate
to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic." sentence comes from. Are you
suggesting
that 10-30% of BBN's total output goes to Exodus? Or that 10-30% of Exodus
output
goes to BBN?

The first scenario is ridiculous. The second scenario is possible, but I
would suspect
it is closer to 10% than 30%.

-dsr-

...Still not speaking for the company...





Current thread: