nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 20:00:57 -0800
Brett Frankenberger wrote:
:: Sean M. Doran writes :: This from the same guy who routinely bashes ATM in the Internet Infrastrucutre Backbones (a view I agree with). Didn't you just recently post that you thought you were getting old because you liked simple things and didn't think there was much merit to doing routing at Layer 2 *and* Layer 3? And now you want connection state in many boxes along the path of a TCP session?
Are you sure you're not confusing Sean with me? We both worked for Sprint :) --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jerry Scharf (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)