nanog mailing list archives

Re: moving to IPv6

From: Scott W Brim <swb () newbridge com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 11:23:14 -0500

The only use I can see is in China, or India, where you want to use a
billion addresses and still have enough room to make management relatively
easy.

...Scott
--
Scott Brim, Newbridge Networks Inc.
swb () newbridge com
+1.607.273.5472

Current thread:

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Evans (Nov 01)
  - Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
  - moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
    - Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)

(Thread continues...)