nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
Of course, there is a rather large contingent of the Internet community that is of the opinion that IPv6 is a solution in search of a problem.
Amen to that. I (and I think many others) still have yet to understand what that aborted child of OSI has to offer us. -- Peter Galbavy @ Home in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.whirl-y-gig.org.uk/ http://www.demon.net Be remembered not for your final destination, but for your journey.
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Evans (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)