nanog mailing list archives

Re: moving to IPv6


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 13:41:03 -0500

On Sun, Nov 02, 1997 at 11:59:17AM -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
In a world where the internet industry is becoming
more and more like the telecoms industry, the
necessity of users to have protocol level access
to the network is diminishing, and the dangers
of doing so are becoming greater. Which telcos
will blithely hand out SS7 interconnects to
users? Without (routable) IP access, there
would be no SYN floods of distant networks, no
source spoofing, less hacking, easier traceability,
and the BGP table need only be OTO 1 entry per
non-leaf node on a provider interconnection
graph.

That's why everyone is abandoning traditionals ISPs and going with proxy
providers like AOL.

Um, "Huh, Phil?"

Following the Boardwatch ISP directory, for just one source, seems to
indicate otherwise.

This is a fairly sweeping observation... on what sources do you base
it?

Replies redirected to nodlist () nodewarrior net.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Pedantry.  It's not just a job, it's an
Tampa Bay, Florida          adventure."  -- someone on AFU      +1 813 790 7592


Current thread: