nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 19:48:36 +0000
Randy, Randy Bush wrote:
What problem is IPv6 solving?IPv6 solved the problem it was intended to solve.
...
And IPv6 did not even have to be deployed! Many people consider this to be a good thing, as IPv6 has not really been demonstrated to improve anything.
I must remember to publish my EGP stargate 99 proposal which by use of parallel quantum-mechanical computation evaluates optimum routing path based on all known network performance and policy criteria. By publishing this, MAE-East being broken will instantly no longer be a problem for us ISPs. :-) Seriously: IPv6 - spot on. -- Alex Bligh GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jerry Scharf (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Thomas Narten (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John Curran (Nov 03)