Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:21:14 -0800
________________________________________ From: David Burt [david_burt () filteringfacts org] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:50 AM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content But what's wrong with offering "opt out" instead of "opt in" filtering, as long as it's relatively easy and private to opt out? This will help keep kids safe. Heck, even the ACLU agrees software is the better solution, per this Oct 23, 2007 entry on their website: "Keep Kids Safe with Software, Not Censorship" http://blog.aclu.org/index.php?/archives/318-Keep-Kids-Safe-with-Software,-Not-Censorship.html Mandatory "Opt Out" filtering of pornographic sites by ISPs I think is the next wave in democratic countries. Japan is also planning it (see story below). I think this is a trend that will accelerate in democratic countries as societies look for new ways to protect children from the inundation of pornography on the Internet. Would this work in the U.S.? I think the ISPs would fight it like hell, and the civil liberties groups would too. But if "opting out" were easy enough and reasonably anonymous, I think the current Supreme Court might uphold it. Eweek story on Japan's opt-out filtering proposal : In response to complaints from parents, the Japanese government in December ordered mobile carriers NTT Docomo, KDDI, Softbank and Willcom to begin implementing mobile phone filtering for minors. Mobile phone online filtering already is available by the Japanese carriers, but according to Gyaku.jp<http://Gyaku.jp>, few use the option. The proposed regulations would strengthen existing policy by requiring online filtering to be the default setting for phones intended for minors. The filtering could be turned off with the explicit request of the minor's patent or guardian. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2242756,00.asp More stuff on my blog at www.filteringfacts.org<http://www.filteringfacts.org/> ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 08)
- Re: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 08)