Interesting People mailing list archives
Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:31:28 -0800
________________________________________ From: Lauren Weinstein [lauren () vortex com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:36 PM To: David Farber Cc: lauren () vortex com Subject: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000352.html Greetings. Can excessive ultraviolet light exposure cause brain damage to politicians? One might think so after reviewing the Australian government's plan to require ISPs to perform Chinese-style blocking of Internet sites that the government considers to be "inappropriate" for children -- based on a government blacklist ( http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,22989956-15306,00.html ). Down in the merry old land of Oz, this mandatory blocking would apply by default to all home and school Internet subscribers. ISPs would have to be contacted individually by users who wished to obtain an unblocked feed by being added to an opt-out list (which I suspect would rapidly become known as the "pervert list" by the Australian overlords of Internet decency). I won't insult your intelligence by listing here the myriad reasons -- you know them as well as I do -- why such a plan is doomed to failure (but I will note that even the so-called "Great Firewall of China" Internet blocking infrastructure leaks like a sieve -- and that's in an environment where penalties can be very harsh indeed). Obviously, what we're actually looking at in the Australian case is political grandstanding of the most base sort. To make censored feeds available upon request is one thing, but to make censorship the default and then require persons to specifically identify themselves to opt-out is turning the concept of freedom of communications on its head. Speaking of heads, it wouldn't hurt the politicians down under to stay out of the summer sun, or at least wear hats more often. Fried brains are not conducive to the creation of sensible Internet (or any other) policies. And since the inane COPA and similar Internet censorship laws are still bouncing around the courts here in the U.S., the same prescription might well apply to our own politicians as well. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 08)
- Re: Australia to Require Mandatory ISP Filtering of "Inappropriate" Content David Farber (Jan 08)