Re: Petraeus

[lists <lists () oitc com>]

Has everyone forgotten Eisenhower and his relatively public affair?

What worries me is that everyone is so focused of the salacious nature of this but there are much more important items:

1) How is it that you can receive, in your eyes, "harassing" email; hand it to a friend in the FBI and have the FBI 
investigate it and even get court orders to access the "senders" accounts?  My understanding is that the FBI doesn't 
investigate harassing emails because they are to thin. They are more focused on cyberterrorism, child porn, and to a 
minor (unfortunately) degree financial theft.  One might be concerned that it is so easy to start such an investigation.

2) The paramour has classified documents on her home computer (not from the general per FBI). This is a criminal 
violation.  Why isn't she arrested?


On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:

> On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) wrote:
>
> > Momentary lack in judgement does not define your duty to country, nor does it define you.
>
> Apparently, it does, actually...
>
> -danny
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.