Re: Re: wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician?

["Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>]

On 8/29/07, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:

> OK, I've done that. No-one got killed. Then I banned guns in the UK, and
> our murder rate was suddenly one twentyth of the USA.

So you're claiming that murders with firearms went DOWN after the ban?

See, I told you they avoid all contact with truth.

> And I have a theory about how this works. My theory goes like this - when
> you have a lot less guns in the population, you get a lot less people
> being killed by guns.
>
> Let me know what you think of that theory.

I think its not much of a theory - since it defies the facts, for one,
and for another, it has no effect what-so-ever on the murder rate. And
you are justifying the ban based on the murder rate, right? You're not
just some dictator-wannabe that hates guns for no real reason, right?

> Anyway - I'm all in favour of having lots of guns in America. That's
> because I never go there.

Good. Keep up the support. I'll gladly set up a PayPal account for
your donations to my gun purchasing fund.


> Healing the effect sounds good to me. When I fell into a bed of nettles
> and ow ow ow, the cream I put on my arm worked so much better than cutting
> down all the nettles.

And because your way of thinking doesn't allow you to consider
anything deeper or worse than nettles you will always come to a bad
conclusion a matters that require deeper thought. Cancer, for
instance. Treating the symptoms of cancer (pick your cancer, pick your
symptoms) does not eradicate the cancer, end result: you still die of
cancer.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.