Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: MS not telling enough
From: "Geo." <georger () nls net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:14:16 -0400
I swore an oath never again to apply my skills in a way that helps
Microsoft. So that means.. no forensics that show it actually was the user downloading porn instead of the OS being exploited? Geo. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics, (continued)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics TheGesus (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Jeremy Bishop (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics DAN MORRILL (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics J.A. Terranson (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics security curmudgeon (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 21)
- morphed into certification argument (was : MS not telling enough - ethics) Michael Holstein (Aug 19)
- Re: not telling enough - ethics Bennett Todd (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough James Tucker (Aug 19)