Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: MS not telling enough
From: James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:26:00 +0100
tuytumadre () att net wrote:
I respect your right to have an opinion, however I do not respect the fact that your opinion completely sucks ass. I meen seriously man, when has MS really become that bad? ....
TBH as long as the kernel I'm running can reliably schedule processes and allocate memory I'm quite happy. My only other provisor is that the source has a LOW likelihood of containing the comment "//does this go here???" and the like. This leaves me with a reduction in my choices.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics, (continued)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics DAN MORRILL (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics J.A. Terranson (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics security curmudgeon (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 21)
- morphed into certification argument (was : MS not telling enough - ethics) Michael Holstein (Aug 19)
- Re: not telling enough - ethics Bennett Todd (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough James Tucker (Aug 19)