Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics
From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:08:17 +1000
Hi J.A. Well done, anyone else who knows of people committing fraud against isc2 should report them. Unfortunately I don't think its feasible for isc2 to check everybody. They do random credential checking and I should I know, since I was audited after I passed the exam. The CISSP cert is the best security cert around, without a doubt. cheers Ivan Coric, CISSP On 8/19/05, J.A. Terranson <measl () mfn org> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, DAN MORRILL wrote:Anyone have any statistics they can share on how many people get their CISSP revoked due to ethical issues?I have first hand personal knowledge of 2 CISSPs who were brought to the attention of ISC2 for (a) forging a college diploma, and (b) participating in a blatant fraud against one of their clients, respectively. And we all know of the great numbers of CISSPs who could not *possibly* have met the minimum practice requirements (hrmmm... You're 17, and you meet the prereqs? Yeah, riiighttt.). ISC2 cert is not policed, and therefore, it is worthless. Worse than worthless, as it purports to "certify" the character and nature of a certificate holder, and does so while making zero attempt to actually insure the implied endorsement is both valid and warranted. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: MS not telling enough Jason Coombs (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough TheGesus (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough J u a n (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics DAN MORRILL (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics TheGesus (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Jeremy Bishop (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics DAN MORRILL (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics J.A. Terranson (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics security curmudgeon (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics Ivan . (Aug 21)
- morphed into certification argument (was : MS not telling enough - ethics) Michael Holstein (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics DAN MORRILL (Aug 18)
- Re: not telling enough - ethics Bennett Todd (Aug 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough tuytumadre (Aug 18)
- Re: Re: MS not telling enough James Tucker (Aug 19)