Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started
From: Charlie Harvey <charlie () peopleandplanet org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:55:42 +0100
| I don't really see any question of ethics, morals, or legality here. The | burgaler is at fault. Said intruder may not be guilty of theft, and may | have had "pure" motives, but they're still plainly guilty of Tresspass and | Breaking and Entering. But trespass is only a civil offence and not a criminal one (in the UK anyhow) and breaking and entering is not in itself a crime, only a constituent part of burglary - you'd also have to prove intent to steal. So you could sue him/her, but strictly speaking no criminal act has occured... Sorry to be a pedantiscist. Charlie _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Support the Sasser-author fund started, (continued)
- RE: Support the Sasser-author fund started Poof (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Valdis . Kletnieks (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Aaron Gee-Clough (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Micah McNelly (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Harlan Carvey (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Valdis . Kletnieks (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Cedric Blancher (May 13)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started James Riden (May 13)
- Re: Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Kurt Seifried (May 16)
- Re: Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started John Galt (May 17)
- Re: Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started madsaxon (May 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started John Galt (May 18)
- Re: Support the Sasser-author fund started Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)