Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Support the Sasser-author fund started


From: "Poof" <poof () fansubber com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:28:10 -0400

Well actually...

By not patching your system you're leaving yourself open to exploit and the
danger of having your machine attacking another machine.

Now- If a person doesn't get something fixed that they know exists and can
avoid an 'accident' then they are indirectly responsible. (EG. You know the
safety seat you're sticking your baby in has a recall because it can
strangle your child. Yet you never trade it in. You're still indirectly
responsible for your babies death.) Then again... You'd have to prove
that... >.<

~
(Yes, I know it's a stupid example.)

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-
admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:11 PM
To: Duquette, John
Cc: Full Disclosure List
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Support the Sasser-author fund started

On Thu, 13 May 2004 10:16:50 EDT, "Duquette, John" <john.duquette () eds com>
said:

Why not punish all the admins/users who failed to patch their systems in
time as well.

You *WILL* install this patch within 24 hours, or go to jail.  The fact
that
it might crash your payroll system is no excuse.

What's wrong with this picture?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:


Current thread: