Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: The 'good worm' from HP
From: michael williamson <michael () puffin tamucc edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:42:27 -0500
Except that the scenario you describe isn't near complete. What will happen is either it will get attacked by a benign worm (possibly breaking something) or a malicious worm (definitely breaking something) only a short while later. Which would you prefer then ?
I'd prefer to not have to deal with systems built on house cards, but sometimes that's just not avoidable nor realistic. I can't deal with too much downtime either.
I think it is _your_ responsibility to shield your box from the internet
the box _is_ fairly well shielded.
if it is that fickle and that important to you.
I'm really wanting phase this P.O.S. out, but I will mention this sort of crap is not that uncommon of "turnkey solutions" in the windows world. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Windows Update, (continued)
- Re: Windows Update ASB (Aug 23)
- Re: Windows Update David Vincent (Aug 23)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Florian Weimer (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP fulldisclosure (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Bart . Lansing (Aug 23)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP joe (Aug 22)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP The Central Scroutinizer (Aug 22)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP stephane nasdrovisky (Aug 23)