Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: The 'good worm' from HP
From: michael williamson <michael () puffin tamucc edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:00:57 -0500
There are much better alternatives to using exploit code to install patches. The security folk at TAMU have come up with an in-line network sniffer automagically blocks infected machines and notifies them via an internal webserver of their infection. After a set time it allows them back on. (clever...motivates _user_ to clean/patch) http://netsquid.tamu.edu/ This is a _lot_ more responsible than running exploit code of any sort, even for a good purpose. I admin one particular windows server that I must actually wait for vender approval before applying any hotfixes. I'd be extremely pissed if some do-gooder net admin tried to patch my box via sploit code and ended up breaking it. (it is that fickle) -Michael _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Windows Update, (continued)
- Re: Windows Update Darren Reed (Aug 23)
- RE: Windows Update joe (Aug 23)
- Re: Windows Update ASB (Aug 23)
- Re: Windows Update David Vincent (Aug 23)
- Re: Windows Update Darren Reed (Aug 23)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Florian Weimer (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP fulldisclosure (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Bart . Lansing (Aug 23)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP joe (Aug 22)