Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux]
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:27:29 +0200
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:33:11 -0800 Gadi Evron <ge () egotistical reprehensible net> wrote:
I apologize if this somehow gets to the list twice, I accidentally posted it here with the wrong email address: 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility) for the software you use (in other words - tech support and someone to blame).
Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).
3. No source (!!) available for people to examine, thus making it, to a level, harder to locate security "holes" - for outsides in any case.
There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that a lot of propriatary os code has leaked? georgi _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 12)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] vb (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better vb (Nov 12)
- clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better Brent J. Nordquist (Nov 13)
- Re: clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better vb (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better David Maynor (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Georgi Guninski (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Charles E. Hill (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux vb (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Luis Bruno (Nov 13)
- kievonline.org "were back" Maxime Ducharme (Nov 13)