Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux

[Luis Bruno <lbruno () republico estv ipv pt>]

Gadi Evron wrote:
> there is a lot to be said for:
> 1. A serious (note serious) commercial company that has a crew working 
>    on addressing security concerns, and updating the product.
> 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility) 
>    for the software you use (in other words - someone to blame).

Your clients' safety is your own safety, and nobody was ever fired for
buying IBM either. But the accountability argument that goes with
$BIG_CORPORATION's name doesn't have any value. The EULA on your products
debunks the accountability myth.

-- 
Luis Bruno    C8-H10-N4-O2-CH3-CH2-OH
UTM 29T 629481 E 4511776 N  Alt: 576m

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html