Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: why commcerical software *could* be better
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:48:57 -0800
Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).
This post was *not* about Microsoft.
There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that a lot of propriatary os code has leaked?
I heard *rumors*. Maybe they are true, maybe they aren't.You can buy the source if you are a company/EDU that develops/researches on/for Windows.
China just got (paid for) an executable version too.
georgi
-- Gadi Evron (i.e. ge), ge () linuxbox org. The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf PGP key for ge () linuxbox org - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.ascNote: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email messages using:
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux], (continued)
- [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 12)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] vb (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better vb (Nov 12)
- clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better Brent J. Nordquist (Nov 13)
- Re: clarification - reasons as to why commercial software *could* be better vb (Nov 13)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better David Maynor (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux] Georgi Guninski (Nov 12)
- Re: why commcerical software *could* be better Gadi Evron (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Charles E. Hill (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux vb (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux Luis Bruno (Nov 13)
- kievonline.org "were back" Maxime Ducharme (Nov 13)
- AW: kievonline.org "were back" Michael Linke (Nov 13)