Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Security and the Government
From: "jeradonah" <jeradonah () fastmail ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:15:02 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:56:57 -0600 (CST), Lance Spitzner <lance () spitzner net> wrote:
I have no idea where to post this, so I thought I would bounce this off the peanut gallery :) I decided to express some of my concerns about our government's computer security to our representatives. After some searching, I found the "SUBCOMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY" at http://www.house.gov/reform/gmit/index.htm. The committee is chaired by Congressmen Stephen Horn, who recently released the committee's first report on computer security. I went to Mr. Horn's website to obtain his email address, http://www.house.gov/horn/. I found the address, but how he uses email concerns me. Remeber, this is one of the lead congressmen involved in the USA's Information Technology. "Send e-mail to steve.horn () mail house gov. Please include your full name and postal address, including ZIP code, since I respond by U.S. mail. Thank you." What can one imply from this .... ?
that email is the last form of communication that congress respects. the convention still is: personal phone calls (and especially visits) "show" that the constituent is *really* interested overnight mail also demonstrates constituent interest personal letters are ranked third email is ranked last. indeed, email is often unread, not just unanswered (although you will prolly get an automated response). this is really important to communicate with congress about computer/ security issues, as they have little experience with computers for the most part and have no idea about the implications of their actions and the bills they propose and/or pass. i am including the "instruction set" from aip about science and technology issues. you can easily replace "science and technology" with "computers and security" issues. hope this helps... (i commend you for making the effort. more of us should do so...) ac http://www.aip.org/enews/fyi/1998/fyi98.071.htm Communicating With Congress: Correspondence Within the next few weeks, Congress will take steps to decide how much money the federal government will spend next year on science and technology programs. An important part of this process will be constituent input. Senators and representatives receive thousands of letters every month. Members use this correspondence in making decisions on policy and budgets. Over the years, most Members report that they receive little mail about science and technology matters. Contrast this situation with well-organized letter writing campaigns from other interest groups, and predicting whose issues receive the most attention is easy. You can help to change this situation by spending a few minutes to write to your representatives. Taking the time to write a letter shows that you care about science and technology issues, and will build support for S&T. Your correspondence will be more effective if you follow these guidelines: TIMING: A letter sent months before an issue is considered is likely to be forgotten; one sent after Congress acts is a missed opportunity. FYI will provide notice of key events. BREVITY: Legislative staffs are severely overworked. Limit your letter to one page and one subject. Resist the temptation to include many enclosures -- they will, in all likelihood, not be read. SCIENTIFIC JARGON: Most Members and their staffs freely admit that they know little about most scientific issues. As appropriate, use a few sentences to offer a nontechnical overview. YOUR IDENTITY: Nothing is more frustrating for congressional staff than trying to decipher an illegible signature -- worse, an entire letter. Ensure that your letter is legible by typing it. Include your name, home address, and telephone number. E-MAIL: While some congressional offices are equipped to handle E- mail, others are not. The safest course is to "snail" mail it. FAXES: Many offices resent a fax campaign -- it clogs their machines and uses their paper. Look next to any congressional fax machine and you will find a congressional waste paper basket. Unless there are severe time constraints, avoid faxing. BE SPECIFIC: Congressional offices revolve around legislation. If there is a bill number, cite it. If you do not know it, or if the bill has not been introduced, be specific: "I write about the FY 1999 appropriation for...." Check our web site (http://www.aip.org/gov/) under "Budget Information," which is organized by department/agency, or contact us at fyi () aip org USE THREE PARAGRAPHS: Paragraph 1: Explain your reason for writing. Briefly describe your "credentials" or experience. Paragraph 2: Describe the importance of the issue. Cite relevant facts and avoid emotionalism. Frame your discussion from a national, rather than a personal perspective. Paragraph 3: Request - not demand - a specific action. Thank the Member for his/her consideration of your views. Offer assistance. ADDRESS STYLE: The post office prefers that you do not use office numbers. The correct address style is: The Honorable ______________ United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Representative __________: The Honorable _______________ U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator _______________: _________________________________________________________________ http://fastmail.ca/ - Fast Free Web Email for Canadians
Current thread:
- Security and the Government Lance Spitzner (Jan 15)
- Re: Security and the Government George Capehart (Jan 15)
- Re: Security and the Government dan.schlitt (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government Joe Dauncey (Jan 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security and the Government Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 15)
- Re: Security and the Government Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government ark (Jan 16)
- RE: Security and the Government Keith.Morgan (Jan 16)
- RE: Security and the Government dlaumann (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government jeradonah (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government Guy D. Hadsall (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government Adam Shostack (Jan 19)
- Re: Security and the Government ark (Jan 19)
- Re: Security and the Government Adam Shostack (Jan 19)
- Re: Security and the Government Rama Kant (Jan 16)
- Re: Security and the Government Security Related (Jan 18)
- Re: Security and the Government George Capehart (Jan 15)