Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls
From: Samuel Garnier <samuel.garnier () HPU EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:57:38 +0000
Hi Steve, Are there any reasons why you're considering purchasing a Palo Alto firewall rather than buying another FortiGate? I would imagine the migration would be smoother and your team must be quite familiar with operating a FortiGate firewall by now. FortiGate seems to be offering similar next gen features than Palo Alto. [HPU-email-signaturelogo] Samuel Garnier Lead, Network and Telecom Hawai`i Pacific University Infrastructure Services, ITS 1164 Bishop St. Suite 900 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 Ph: (808) 356-5286 www.hpu.edu<http://www.hpu.edu/> Information Technology Services staff will never ask for your password. Never email your password to anyone or share confidential information in emails. From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Camacho Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:25 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] small schools - nextgen firewalls Any example from larger institutions? We are a Fortigate shop, but we are due for an upgrade this year. The PA products look very compelling, but wondering if there are any "gotchas" that might hurt in larger shops. We are about 30K FT students and 50K plus PT students with about 6000 employees. Currently two 10G pipes, but looking to add at least 1 more 10G internet pipe at our backup DC for redundancy. Steve Camacho, B.Comm. Director, Technology Services Information Technology Services Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning 205 Humber College Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M9W 5L7 416.675.6622 X4967 http://its.humber.ca<http://its.humber.ca/> Please call the Support Centre at 416.675.6622 X8888 for service, support, and updates. Collaborative - Innovative - Professional - Passionate ________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] on behalf of Kurz, Kenneth J. [kkurz () OU EDU] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:30 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Subject: Re: [SECURITY] small schools - nextgen firewalls I'm relatively new to the list but have seen this thread and people comparing a SonicWall to a Palo. IMHO apples and oranges. For a smaller organization why not something like a Meraki MX box with the security license...I think priced along the lines of the SonicWall but just as (if not more) capable. The admin interface is better than either of the others. Ken ----------------------------------------------- Ken Kurz Director, Information Security & Risk Management OU Information Technology 405-325-6441 - O 405-534-6079 - C www.ou.edu/ouit<http://www.ou.edu/ouit> ----------------------------------------------- From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Julie Newton Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:30 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Subject: [SECURITY] small schools - nextgen firewalls Are there any small schools using SonicWall (NSA 220, NSA250 or NSA 2600 models) or PaloAlto (PA-200, PA-500, PA-2020 or PA-2050) ? We currently have 20 MB pipe (we *are* small) but expect 1 GB within <2 years as Google Fiber is installed across Austin. We have 2 discrete networks and want an appliance that works across both with unique filter sets. I am most concerned with malware filtering ability, throughput and a good admin interface. Currently on older Cymphonix (pre-Untangle), which required an appliance for each network and had a clunky UI and filtering did not catch ransomware. Any suggestions or opinions? Thanks in advance for your help! -Julie Newton Director of Information Technology ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 100 E. 27th Street, Austin, Texas 78705 austinseminary.edu CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and attached material are intended for the use of the individual or organization to whom they are addressed and may not be distributed, copied, or disclosed to other unauthorized persons. This material may contain confidential and/or personal information subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, and/or the Personal Health Information Protection Act. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify me immediately and delete this message. Do not email, print, copy, distribute, or disclose this email or its contents further. Thank you for your co-operation and assistance. ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2015.0.5645 / Virus Database: 4260/8923 - Release Date: 01/13/15
Current thread:
- small schools - nextgen firewalls Julie Newton (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Bob Williamson (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Barros, Jacob (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Kapucu, Ali (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Blackwood, James (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Kurz, Kenneth J. (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Steve Camacho (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Nathaniel Hall (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Samuel Garnier (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Steve Camacho (Jan 13)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Kevin Halgren (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Kramp, William D (Jan 14)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Kevin Halgren (Jan 15)
- Re: small schools - nextgen firewalls Bob Williamson (Jan 13)