Re: RIAA Notices

[Paul Keser <pkeser () STANFORD EDU>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe-

Can you share the details of your automation?  Either on list or off?
We are definitely looking for a way to automate processing DMCA
complaints and I am sure we are not the only one...

I remember seeing you post about it before but if there are any details
available that would be *fantastic*

Thanks

- -PaulK

Paul Keser
Assoc. Information Security Officer
Stanford University
650.724.9051
GPG Fingerprint:  DBA3 E20F CE91 28AA DA1C  4A77 3BD9 C82D 2699 24FB


Joel Rosenblatt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is some facts from our automated DMCA system
>
> Looking at the last 157 takedown notices
> Average difference between timestamp in notice and verification was
> 388.64 seconds (6.48)
> Maximum time was 3110 Seconds (51.83)
> Minimum time was 0 Seconds
> Significance – in one hour, we may turn over the dynamic IP address 4-6
> times
>
> Looking at the timestamp they send you is a good way to find the wrong
> person if your using a dynamic IP assignment.
>
> Since we switched (to automation), we find less than 2% bad reports.
>
> My 2 cents
> Joel Rosenblatt
>
> Joel Rosenblatt, Manager Network & Computer Security
> Columbia Information Security Office (CISO)
> Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033
> http://www.columbia.edu/~joel
>
>
> --On Monday, May 05, 2008 11:27 AM -0400 Tracy Mitrano
> <tbm3 () CORNELL EDU> wrote:
>
> > Yes, Pat, we have a single case of this description which we are still
> > investigating and one where the time stamps do not match up with any
> > activity on the
> > IP address.  
> >
> >
> > Glad you asked.  If other folks begin to see anomalies it would be
> > good to share that kind of information among us for the purpose of
> > identifying
> > potential patterns.
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Tracy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 28, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Falcon, Patricia wrote:
> >
> >
> > Last week we saw perhaps double or triple what we usually get in a
> > week.  Today we received word from two of the students who said that they
> > hadn't downloaded what the RIAA said they had.  Is anyone else seeing
> > false positives out of this group?
> >
> > Pat Falcon
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > IT Security Policy and Communication Coordinator
> > Computing and Information Services
> > Brown University :: Box 1885 :: Providence, RI 02912
> > 401.863.9259 :: 401.863.7329 [fax]
> > www.brown.edu/cis/itsecurity
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Joel Rosenblatt, Manager Network & Computer Security
> Columbia Information Security Office (CISO)
> Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033
> http://www.columbia.edu/~joel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIH6EuO9nILSaZJPsRAunpAJ9/czB/r7cH8ef1FuCFKYh207ZfJwCcDdta
ovBOj9P+sss000QmaUZxPGw=
=cR+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----