Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge
From: "Schmidt, Eric W" <erschmid () IUPUI EDU>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:25:22 -0500
The IU School of Medicine and our partner hospital, Clarian Health conducted a joint evaluation of several laptop encryption solutions over the past few months. We chose Pointsec because of the ease of deployment and centralized management, the transparency of the encryption to the user, and the fact that the software throttles itself during the initial disk encryption based on the current use of the laptop. It works with the Windows login so our users only have to login once. It also works with the single sign-on solution Clarian is implementing. A big reason we chose a whole disk encryption product over a product that provides folder and file encryption is we wanted to take as much of the security decision out of the hands of the user as possible. If an incident ever occurred where a laptop was lost or stolen, we wanted to be able to stand up in front of Channel (you fill in the channel number) and say "the laptop was lost but the data was completely protected because the entire hard drive was encrypted" rather than "the laptop was lost and the user was instructed to place all files that needed protection in the proper folder". ____________________________ Eric W. Schmidt, CISSP, CISM Chief Security Officer Indiana University School of Medicine (O): (317) 278-8751 (E): erschmid () iupui edu -----Original Message----- From: Logan, Kimberly (loganks) [mailto:LOGANKS () UCMAIL UC EDU] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:05 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Hi, The University of Cincinnati is also looking into whole disk encryption. Based on some responses previously received, I think we have narrowed our investigation to Safeguard Easy and Pointsec. However, I should just mention that, even though it may be a more expensive option, we really like PGP, too. Kim Kim Logan Information Security Officer University of Cincinnati (513)556-9070 kim.logan () uc edu -----Original Message----- From: Paul DeStefano [mailto:pdestefa () WILLAMETTE EDU] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:10 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Hello Steve, Good question. This technology seems to be evolving, still. We are currently looking into the available solutions, also. I'll be sure to let you know what we decide. We're interested in using two factor authentication for the whole disk encryption. So, I would like to hear if anyone else who responds is doing that, as well. I also just wanted to mention the product we think looks promising and has been recommended to us: SafeGuard from Utimaco. Anyone with experience using that? Thanks, Paul -- Paul DeStefano, WITS Network Services Consultant Willamette University E-Mail: pdestefa(ta)willamette.edu
Current thread:
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge, (continued)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Pettis, Frederick (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Roger Safian (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Michael Sana (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Pettis, Frederick (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Roger Safian (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Pettis, Frederick (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Paul DeStefano (Jan 12)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Steve Brukbacher (Jan 13)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Lovaas,Steven R (Jan 13)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Logan, Kimberly (loganks) (Jan 16)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Schmidt, Eric W (Jan 16)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Basgen, Brian (Jan 16)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Clifford Collins (Jan 19)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Steve Brukbacher (Jan 19)
- Re: pointsec vs. Guardian Edge Harold Winshel (Jan 19)