Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army
From: "Brock, Anthony - NET" <Anthony.Brock () OREGONSTATE EDU>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:18:23 -0800
-----Original Message----- Maybe they meant 29 IPs were probing. We saw around 35 of your IPs either scanning port 2967 or actively attempting to exploit the Symantec vulnerability against systems here.
Very possible. However, this still seems a bit extreme for implementing a "permanent block" of this scale. Also, there should be some method for notifying the affected site and correcting the issue. Tony
Current thread:
- Connectivity problems with the US Army Brock, Anthony - NET (Jan 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Mike Iglesias (Jan 18)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Jay Tumas (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Brock, Anthony - NET (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Brock, Anthony - NET (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Jamie A. Stapleton (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Samuel Liles (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Randy Marchany (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Mike Iglesias (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Brock, Anthony - NET (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army David Gillett (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Pace, Guy (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army HALL, NATHANIEL D. (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Cal Frye (Jan 19)
- Re: Connectivity problems with the US Army Brock, Anthony - NET (Jan 19)