Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Desktop patch management?
From: Marty Hoag <Marty.Hoag () NDSU NODAK EDU>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:33:54 -0500
Smith, Barry wrote:
Several have mentioned the use of Microsoft's SUS to deliver updates to the desktop. We currently have a mixed environment of NT 4.0 and Win 2000 servers but we have NOT gone to Active Directory. I know that SUS needs to be on at least a 2000 server. Is it necessary to have Active Directory going to use it? Our clients include a very mixed bag of everything from Win 95 to Win XPs.
As Craig mentioned SUS doesn't need Active Directory but as far as I know the only clients available are for Windows 2000 and XP (maybe 2003 as well?). Are there clients for the "older" systems? marty ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Discussion Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/cg/.
Current thread:
- Re: Desktop patch management?, (continued)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Brian K. Dore' (Sep 12)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Eoghan Casey (Sep 12)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Clyde Hoadley (Sep 12)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Brian K. Dore' (Sep 12)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Dan Roberts (Sep 12)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Melissa Guenther (Sep 13)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Craig W. Drake (Sep 16)
- Desktop patch management? Smith, Barry (Sep 30)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Craig W. Drake (Sep 30)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Christian Grewell (Sep 30)
- Re: Desktop patch management? Marty Hoag (Sep 30)