Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: The lack of hard questions
From: "Matthieu Suiche" <msuiche () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:05:39 +0200
Ergosum is right. For instance, as you can see here, http://blogs.msdn.com/michael_howard/archive/2008/08/18/matt-miller-joins-the-security-science-team.aspx , MSFT recently hired Matt Miller/skape. And I'm sure they also have several unknow engineers who are very talented regarding security field. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:05 AM, ergosum <ergosum () neurosecurity com> wrote:
On Thursday 28 August 2008 00:43:43 Charles Miller wrote:But the problem is, if there are only a handful of people who can make a reliable exploit for a particular vulnerability (or not) and none of them work for MS, how can MS accurately determine whether an exploit for a particular vulnerability will be somewhat reliable or totally reliable (or not possible at all)? Doesn't anyone remember gobbles :)Charles, no ofense, but the MS Security team has several members who can make reliable exploits, probably much better than many "security experts". So, don't take for granted that MS is full of crap because that shows your lack of knowledge about them.On Aug 27, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:05:42 EDT, Pusscat said:My assumption would be that if it can be made reliable by anyone, then it's reliable. It probably shouldn't be a quantum value, collapsed by our inability ;)Yes, it only has to be weaponized once._______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave-- http://www.neurosecurity.com "We must be the change we wish to see in the world" Mahatma Gandhi _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
-- Matthieu Suiche _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: The lack of hard questions, (continued)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Dave Aitel (Aug 26)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Mike Reavey (Sep 01)
- Re: The lack of hard questions dan (Sep 02)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Dave Aitel (Aug 26)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Charles Miller (Aug 26)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Pusscat (Aug 27)
- Message not available
- Re: The lack of hard questions Charles Miller (Sep 01)
- Re: The lack of hard questions ergosum (Sep 01)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Charles Miller (Sep 02)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Matt (Sep 03)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Pusscat (Sep 03)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Pusscat (Aug 27)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Matthieu Suiche (Sep 02)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Charles Miller (Sep 03)
- Re: The lack of hard questions Trygve Aasheim (Sep 03)