Dailydave mailing list archives

Re: Hackers and Painters


From: ken_i_m () fatair net
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:15:27 -0600

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:30:29PM -0300, Tiago Assumpcao (module () whatever org ar) wrote:
"The fact that hackers learn to hack by doing it is another sign of how 
different hacking is from the sciences. Scientists don't learn science 
by doing it, but by doing labs and problem sets. Scientists start out 
doing work that's perfect, in the sense that they're just trying to 
reproduce work someone else has already done for them. Eventually, they 
get to the point where they can do original work. Whereas hackers, from 
the start, are doing original work; it's just very bad. So hackers start 
original, and get good, and scientists start good, and get original."

Most fields of study pursued by "scientists" are mature.  The pioneers
of a field tend to resemble computer hackers.

I think "computer science" is at the stage that the study of electricity
was at in the days of Benjamin Franklin.
-- 
Ken Dyke
"Bits at the speed of light"
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave


Current thread: