Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Re: DDoS protection
From: "Sardina, Dominick" <Dominick.Sardina () pseg com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:14:32 -0400
KT, try www.sucuri.net They provide a great anti-ddos service. Myself, I prefer an outside service from the ISP or a company like Sucuri or Cloudflare, although I lean more towards Sucuri. Regards, Dominick -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of kartik.netec () gmail com Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:49 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Re: DDoS protection Hi, Thanks for your replies. Noted the points raised by Jacint and Kelly Keeton. I appreciate that. May I be kind to seek an opinion/ arguments suggesting if the In-house appliances are more "intelligent" thwarting the application level DOS/ DDoS attacks as compared to ISP provided DOS protection wherein it may even fail to detect them. or if there are other benefits owning an In-house product? As far as Cons are concerned, I feel that the appliance may add some latency which may create issues wherein a latency of milliseconds count. Although we're small, We're an organization playing with ($,¥,€,£) exchanges and heavily regulated by the Government. Thanks, KT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written authorization from PSEG. This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving PSEG. Thank you for your cooperation.
Current thread:
- RE: DDoS protection, (continued)
- RE: DDoS protection Jácint TÓTH (Jun 16)
- RE: DDoS protection Sable, Amol (Jun 16)
- Re: DDoS protection Kelly Keeton (Jun 16)
- Re: DDoS protection Raistlin Majere (Jun 17)
- Re: DDoS protection Dolev Farhi (Jun 17)
- Re: DDoS protection alphaone . tw (Jun 18)
- Re: DDoS protection Claudiu Hulea (Jun 18)
- Re: DDoS protection Jean-Marc Dupuis (Jun 18)
- Re: Re: DDoS protection kartik . netec (Jun 18)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Mikhail A. Utin (Jun 18)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Sardina, Dominick (Jun 20)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Lance Lassetter (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: DDoS protection Kellstr (Jun 20)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Mikhail A. Utin (Jun 20)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Sardina, Dominick (Jun 20)
- RE: Re: DDoS protection Jess Vermont (Jun 23)
- Re: Re: DDoS protection Kellstr (Jun 20)
- Re: DDoS protection Hartley, Christopher J. (Jun 20)
- RE: DDoS protection Wagner, Brett (Jun 20)
- Re: DDoS protection Kellstr (Jun 20)
- RE: DDoS protection Sardina, Dominick (Jun 23)
- RE: DDoS protection Phillip Lofaso (Jun 23)