Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation
From: "Michael Painter" <tvhawaii () shaka com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:09:47 -1000
David Gillett wrote:
I recall suggesting, only slightly tongue-in-cheek, that if the US PATRIOT Act, instead of permitting the FBI to read everyone's emails, had *required* it, the spam problem would have been solved fairly quickly.... David Gillett, CISSP
Finally...a solution even better than Postini! I love it! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation, (continued)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Gillmer, Renier, VF-NZ (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Todd Haverkos (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Champ Clark III (Apr 12)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Joseph Laico (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Ansgar Wiechers (Apr 15)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Mike Saldivar (Apr 15)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Vincent Yeo (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation kartik . netsec (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation rmassanet (Apr 16)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation David Gillett (Apr 18)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Michael Painter (Apr 19)