RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss

["Strykar" <str () hackerzlair org>]

> There is no such problem with TOR, the only problem here is that, it
> doesn't solve my purpose. 

Is this still about breaking into a college network?
It's Tor, not TOR.
Ask and ye shall receive. What is this "purpose" and its underlying problem
that you're facing? 


> I am looking into the technology which TOR
> has been built on.  I am trying to understand the technology of
> tunneling connections from a root machine to many machine (technology
> which developers of TOR has implemented in a great way), my
> requirement is something simliar but i would want it to serve my
> requirements in an intranet & a secured environment...

Don't patronize the Tor developers, read Tor's documentation. You can use
Tor to implement onion routing in an Intranet, this has been documented to
death. 


> Any suggestion about the technology & any simiat tools that you all
> have tried & tested before!!
> I am anxious to work on this front to solve the mystery...

There is no onion routing/anonymizing network as thoroughly tested as Tor.
You're attempting to re-invent the wheel.
Be specific. Describe an end to shed light on the means.


- S



> On 9/27/07, Brett Cunningham <cssniper22 () gmail com> wrote:
> > Can you be more specific at why TOR isn't working for you? Need
> > details of what you don't care for about it.