Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
From: "Rohin Koul" <rohin.koul () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:11:56 +0530
Hi Vivek, I can't be sure but this can help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP_spoofing If you want to send a IP packet with a source IP different from your actual IP and yet want the reply come back to you then you gotta manipulate the address table of your switch :) .. make the IP point to your MAC address. I'm not sure if you want that though. Rohin -- "if you don't know where you are going, what difference does it make,which path you take" ---Cheshire Cat
Current thread:
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss, (continued)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Utmost Bastard (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 13)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss David Gillett (Sep 14)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Dotzero (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 18)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Rohin Koul (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss gjgowey (Sep 28)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 28)