Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
From: cstubbs () gmail com
Date: 28 Sep 2007 01:07:47 -0000
So you're interested in concealing both Layer 2 and Layer 3 ID of the source traffic within a private network ? ie. somewhere that TOR cannot be used ? You should consider broadcast and multicast addresses (both layer 2 and 3 again) as sources, although depending on the network and the target device you may or may not ensure 0% packet loss.
Current thread:
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss, (continued)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 18)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 18)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Rohin Koul (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 26)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Brett Cunningham (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Vivek P (Sep 27)
- Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss gjgowey (Sep 28)
- RE: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss Strykar (Sep 28)