Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: security not a big priority?
From: "Craig Wright" <cwright () bdosyd com au>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:31:24 +1100
Security should be risk related. You need to be able to define the risks and the costs of both implementing a solution or accepting the risk. This should be based on economic cost. To be effective, you need to work with the other teams and look at ways to enable projects in a secure manner. There are nearly always solutions. From your perspective, the start looks like education. People need to understand the risks and this is something you can start to address with little cost or comparitive effort. Regards, Craig -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Francois Yang Sent: Friday, 16 February 2007 3:18 AM Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: security not a big priority? On 2/15/07, Josh Miller <joshua () itsecureadmin com> wrote:
This must be your first security job, right? ;-) All joking aside, this is very common, especially in government jobs, based on my experience. It's a tough road to ride down and I
recommend
documenting all of your efforts for future reference and being as supportive as possible while not creating a problem between you and
the
people you work with. Good luck. Thanks, Josh Miller, RHCE
Actually no. this is my second. I used to be a security admin at a private company. Now it's at a public college and it's way different. At the old place I had the final say in everything. My boss was 100% behind me and management even the president trusted me. So whatever I said, was pretty much what went on. So picture that. Coming from a place where I had full say to a place where I have almost no say. is a big change. yea, I'll just keep working on documenting and trying to show them how important security is. -- If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don't understand the problems and you don't understand the technology. Bruce Schneier Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.
Current thread:
- RE: security not a big priority?, (continued)
- RE: security not a big priority? David Gillett (Feb 16)
- Re: security not a big priority? Isaac Perez (Feb 16)
- Re: security not a big priority? Aman Raheja (Feb 19)
- Re: security not a big priority? Sandip Wadje-Infosec (Feb 19)
- RE: security not a big priority? Tony UcedaVĂ©lez (Feb 21)
- Re[2]: security not a big priority? Adam Pal (Feb 23)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Anonymous (Feb 15)
- Re: security not a big priority? Francois Yang (Feb 15)
- Re: security not a big priority? crazy frog crazy frog (Feb 15)
- RE: security not a big priority? Nhon Yeung (Feb 15)
- RE: security not a big priority? Craig Wright (Feb 15)
- Re: security not a big priority? Henry Troup (Feb 15)
- Re: security not a big priority? saltynetguru (Feb 16)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Anonymous (Feb 19)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Jax Lion (Feb 19)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Alexander Bolante (Feb 20)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Jax Lion (Feb 19)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? cwwoods (Feb 19)
- Re: security not a big priority? steve . dake (Feb 20)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? mehtaharshal (Feb 21)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Jason P. Rusch (Feb 23)
- RE: Re: security not a big priority? David Gillett (Feb 26)
- Re: Re: security not a big priority? Jason P. Rusch (Feb 23)