Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98?
From: dave <dave.m () email it>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:45:38 +0200
| Theoretically, I've not enabled port forwarding in my router/modem, | and so external computer trying to ping or connect to my computer | should not succeed, and if there's no port listening at all (except for | port 139), no other computer should be able to infilitrate right? The infiltrations happen mostly thanks the applicative level. So it's not so important _only_ if you have a port open or not. In this case an introuder, obliged to attack only that port, should exploit first the router. But the most obviuos way is to overwrite network traffic so that a target executable you download would act as RAT. So all security mesures are not so much effective meanwhile you don't know exactly how a binary you download will interact with the whole system. -- Upper reality >oftware. Dave - Skp Core. -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Acquista i tuoi gioielli in tutta sicurezza ed a prezzi veramente imbattibili. Sfoglia il nostro catalogo on-line! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5634&d=25-9 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gohyongkwang (Sep 25)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? dave (Sep 26)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Frynge Customer Support (Sep 26)
- Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gmx (Sep 27)
- Re: Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Frynge Customer Support (Sep 28)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Sep 28)
- RE: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? David Gillett (Sep 28)
- Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gmx (Sep 27)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Luchino - Samel (Sep 26)
- RE: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Robert D. Holtz - Lists (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? krymson (Sep 26)
- Re: Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Gethinj (Sep 28)
- Re:No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Colin Copley (Sep 28)