Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'

[GuidoZ <uberguidoz () gmail com>]

> 1) reinstall OS
> 2) install firewall, AV, etc...
> 3) patch OS in 5 minute window available (as mentioned by Kelly Martin)
> 4) educate Mom on use of AV, anti-spyware, good web practices (don't open
> attachments, click on pop-ups etc...)
> 5) monitor until eventually another virus finds its way in.
> 6) Lather/rinse/repeat.

Unfortunately this seems to be the current state of Windows. When it
comes to ease of use however, none of this is taken into
consideration. You sit someone down with a Windows XP CD and a blank
hand drive, most will be able to get it installed and working without
a whole lot of help or questions. However, sit them down at the same
PC with a Slackware or Debian CD, and I'll bet they will become lost
quite quickly. (I have been there myself.)

Security and easy of use never go hand in hand, unfortunately.

--
Peace. ~G


On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:47:39 -0700, Darren Kirby
<bulliver () badcomputer no-ip com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> First of all, thanks for all the replies, it is way more than I was expecting.
>
> After following the link provided by Bob Bermingham:
> > Sounds like the box is "owned", but not in the way you suspect. From
> > your description, it looks like she is infected with Netsky.P:
>
> > http://antivirus.about.com/cs/allabout/a/netskyp.htm
>
> I can confirm this is indeed the Netsky.P virus. The filenames listed are
> EXACTLY the ones on this box. From reading the description it would seem this
> is very old virus...so she (my mom) is running a very old unpatched windows
> 98? Please let me reiterate at this point that I am really ignorant of
> windows...but I have heard that Microsoft has ended support for this old OS.
> Is there still a patch available?
>
> James Grant posted:
> > 2) Install ZoneAlarm. It's free and it will give her
> > network protection. Set it up for her, because she may
> > not want to read the pop-up questions it asks at the
> > start to know what to allow.
>
> Ironically, she installed this herself...I presume after she was already
> infected. The problem with this she tells me, is that the pop-ups tell her
> "foobar.exe is trying to access the internet" and she can not ever tell if
> foobar.exe is legitimate or not. Unfortunately I don't think I could help her
> on this point, as I would not know either...
>
> You all pretty much suggest installing software firewall, spyware checkers,
> anti-virus scanners, even a hardware firewall...all my mom does is play
> freecell, check email once a day, and browse the web infrequently (1-2 times
> per week), so this hardware firewall seems a bit extreme.
>
> RandyW posted:
> > Without constant monitoring though, the PC WILL become infected again, it's
> > just a matter of time.
>
> This is discouraging, as I don't have the time (nor knowledge) to monitor this
> computer all the time. Perhaps it is time to say screw it and install
> Slackware with a nice KDE desktop for her, because at least I would know how
> to help with her problems, and it seems a lot easier than:
>
> 1) reinstall OS
> 2) install firewall, AV, etc...
> 3) patch OS in 5 minute window available (as mentioned by Kelly Martin)
> 4) educate Mom on use of AV, anti-spyware, good web practices (don't open
> attachments, click on pop-ups etc...)
> 5) monitor until eventually another virus finds its way in.
> 6) Lather/rinse/repeat.
>
> Sorry if I sound affected here, but being a unix guy I do not see how this
> makes windows an 'easier' desktop to use. What do you all think? Is this
> really what you have to do to have a usable windows networked machine?
> Again, not trying to be a troll here, it is an honest question.
>
> Thanks again for all the helpful information,
> much obliged,
>
>
>
> -d
> --
> Part of the problem since 1976
> http://badcomputer.no-ip.com
> Get my public key from
> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=index&search=bulliver
> "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
> - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972



-- 
Peace. ~G