Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Cisco Workaround


From: "Martin, Olivier" <olivier.martin () ccq org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:11:30 -0400

My .02 cents..

There are ways around that, such as denying packets to terminate on routers
interface from unknown addresses as there is no need for these protocols on
cisco routers exept protocol 103 used for PIM.  As multicast routing is not
used on the commercial internet, it can safely be removed.

Olivier


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Tim Donahue [mailto:TDonahue () haynesconstruction com]
Envoyé : Friday, July 25, 2003 3:43 PM
À : 'Ghaith Nasrawi'
Cc : firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Objet : RE: Cisco Workaround


Hmmm.... Why don't you open up the protocols from the addresses that you
need.  Isn't this a standard firewalling technique?

Plus I believe that they said that there are new versions of IOS that are
not vulnerable to this attack, which means that you can upgrade IOS and
resolve the issute all together.

Tim Donahue



-----Original Message-----
From: Ghaith Nasrawi [mailto:libero () aucegypt edu] 
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:33 AM
Cc: firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Cisco Workaround


Well, my question is; what the hell if I was using any of 
these protocols?? Didn't cisco think of that?? They should 
have suggested a more decent solution.


./Ghaith
===============

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday





-----Original Message-----
From: jamesworld () intelligencia com 
[mailto:jamesworld () intelligencia com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:48 PM
To: Alvaro Gordon-Escobar
Cc: firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Cisco Workaround

Alvaro,

No.  The protocol blocked by the access-list is protocol 53 
not protocol

TCP or protocol UDP port 53.

If you need further info, let me know,

-James



At 09:15 7/23/2003, Alvaro Gordon-Escobar wrote:
will this access list modification prevent my internal DNS 
server from
updates to it self from my telco's DNS server?

access-list 101 deny 53 any any
access-list 101 deny 55 any any
access-list 101 deny 77 any any
access-list 101 deny 103 any any
!--- insert any other previously applied ACL entries here
!--- you must permit other protocols through to allow normal
!--- traffic -- previously defined permit lists will work
!--- or you may use the permit ip any any shown here access-list 101 
permit ip any any

Thanks in advance

~alvaro Escobar

-------------------------------------------------------------
----------
----
-------------------------------------------------------------
----------
-----


--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
---
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
----


--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: