Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY
From: Bartholomew Simpson <focusyne () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:14:10 -0800 (PST)
Greeting! Thank you all for responding to my question. I now have several options to further investigate. I think creating a wireless black hole would be the best solution. Management has set the policy that there shall be no RF devices in key areas that hold "very sensitive data" and while that is a great policy, enforcement becomes difficult. Most people entering these areas don't even realize that they are violating the policy and the cost of doing a body cavity search on entry is too expensive. Thanks again. BS
-----Original Message----- From: Bartholomew Simpson
[mailto:focusyne () yahoo com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:29 PM To: vuln-dev () securityfocus com Subject: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Greetings! I have several areas were no wireless communications are allowed cell phones, wireless PDAs, text pagers,
802.11x, etc. I frequently monitor these areas using
NetStumbler but > that will only catch 802.11x traffic. How do I detect the rest of
the wireless traffic? Thanks! BS
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
Current thread:
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY k w (Oct 31)
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Rob Shein (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Gustavo Alberto (Oct 31)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY kamal southall (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY George Capehart (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY jove (Nov 01)
- TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Bartholomew Simpson (Nov 03)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY ATD (Nov 04)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY KF (Nov 26)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Chip Mefford (Nov 26)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Gene (Nov 27)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Chip Mefford (Nov 26)